You are here

Shocking: DraftKings Faces Massive Lawsuit Over Deceptive $1,000 Bonus Bet!

SHARE TWEET GOOGLE+
Use the links to navigate to next/previous articles
Shocking: DraftKings Faces Massive Lawsuit Over Deceptive $1,000 Bonus Bet!
DraftKings is facing criticism over alleged "unfair and deceptive" practices in its bonus bet advertising.

Last week, the Public Health Advocacy Institute (PHAI) initiated a class-action lawsuit against DraftKings, targeting the company's promotional strategy. The legal action, filed in Massachusetts's Middlesex Superior Court, is on behalf of two Massachusetts bettors, Shane Harris and Melissa Scanlon.

According to the complaint, DraftKings is accused of misleading customers by suggesting they would receive a $1,000 bonus after depositing funds into their accounts. PHAI Executive Director Mark Gottlieb emphasized that individuals like Shane and Melissa represent a larger group in Massachusetts who were misled by the bonus offer and might not have signed up if they understood the alleged unfair requirements.

The core of the lawsuit revolves around DraftKings' $1,000 bonus bet offer, which mandates customers to deposit $5,000 into an account and wager $25,000 within 90 days. The complaint contends that meeting these criteria would necessitate a bettor to wager over $276 per day for three months to qualify for the full bonus. Additionally, customers are restricted from withdrawing the bonus as cash and must use it for wagers.

The complaint asserts that DraftKings was aware or should have been aware that its advertising and promotion could be deceptive to new sports betting customers unfamiliar with the intricacies of gambling lingo in the fine print.

PHAI, known for its involvement in tobacco lawsuits, is based at Northeastern University School of Law in Boston. Richard Daynard, a leader at PHAI, who played a role in the tobacco lawsuit in the 1980s, now suggests that DraftKings is aware that its product is prone to addiction. Daynard draws parallels between online gambling advertising and deceptive promotions to hook customers and the practices of cigarette companies in the past.

DraftKings has expressed its intention to "vigorously defend" itself against the allegations. A spokesperson for the company stated that, as a customer-first organization, DraftKings takes consumer protection and responsible gaming seriously. The company claims that the PHAI ignored attempts to engage in an in-person dialogue to address concerns and instead chose to file a lawsuit.

The $1,000 bonus bet offer by DraftKings has been promoted across its U.S. sports betting operations this year. Sportsbooks commonly use promotional offers to attract new customers, especially in emerging markets. With increased scrutiny from legislators and regulators, sportsbook advertising, including in Massachusetts, has come under the spotlight. Multiple jurisdictions have banned the use of the term "risk-free" in sportsbook offers, leading the American Gaming Association to update its Responsible Marketing Code to prohibit such language.

Category: